Evaluating Professional Development (1-off Series) [Thomas R. Guskey] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is a practical guide to. Evaluating Professional. Development. By. Thomas R. Guskey. University of Kentucky. (Article reprinted with permission from Dr. Guskey). Evaluating Professional Development has 27 ratings and 3 reviews. June said: A very user friendly book to guide evaluation efforts at the state and local.
|Published (Last):||22 August 2009|
|PDF File Size:||1.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Things broke down at the organization level. I share their hope. Trivia About Evaluating Profes Danibab added it Feb 08, I recently discovered, for example, that not all stakeholders in professional development trust the same evidence. Evaluating Professional Development by Thomas R. Historically, professional development leaders haven’t done a very good job of providing any such evidence.
Because of their general nature, however, these Standards leave a lot of room for interpretation. Why are levels four and five of your evaluation model—in which professional development is linked to student outcomes—so difficult to accomplish?
Nicholas Little rated it really liked it Sep 15, For example, they describe the importance of extended time for professional development and the need to ensure that activities are ongoing and job-embedded. Can you comment on what we know and don’t know about what makes professional development effective?
Kirkpatrick described four levels of evaluation that he found necessary in determining the value and worth of training programs. Mandy rated it it was amazing Oct 28, They must ensure that research comes from reliable sources, specifically peer-reviewed journals. Jennifer Hingely is currently reading it Aug 06, As we applied the model, however, we found that professional development efforts still were not yielding positive results—but nothing in the model explained why.
In particular, they want people, within proposals, to outline specifically how they will gather evalhating at each of the five levels in the evaluation model. Administrators rated national and state tests highly, while teachers trusted their own, more immediate sources of evidence. It requires a level of experimental rigor that is hard and often impossible to attain in practical school settings.
If gudkey don’t see such evidence, they quite naturally revert back evaluatiing the tried and true things they’ve done in the past. Planning more carefully and more intentionally not only makes evaluation easier, it also leads to much more effective professional development.
Thomas Feller added it Feb 04, Selected pages Title Page. Account Options Sign in. Russel marked it as to-read Feb 11, A related challenge concerns the nature of that evidence, especially its credibility and its timing.
Evaluating Professional Development – Thomas R. Guskey – Google Books
A conversation with Thomas R. I gave feedback when requested and occasionally just because I had an opinion. Books by Thomas R. All other decisions are then based on that fundamental premise. Christine rated it really liked it Jul 03, Jul 20, Carlene Walter rated it really liked it Shelves: But information on levels three, four, and five cannot be gathered at that time.
Corwin – volume profesional Amazon. There guskfy three major aspects of the model that I hope people will consider. Yuskey often in the past, educators have planned professional development based on what’s new and what’s hot, rather than on what is known to work with students.
User Review – Flag as inappropriate I found this book about professional development by Gusky to be well informed and prepared.
Evaluating Professional Development, according to Guskey ()
Organization Support and Change”; 7 “Level 4: Summatively, we need to know the effectiveness of elements at each level to judge the true value and worth of any professional development endeavor. Each level provides different types of information that can be used in both formative and summative ways.
Below, he discusses his five-step process for evaluating professional development in education and its connection to professional development planning. Pam Taylor rated it really liked it Jul 08, A couple of years ago, I identified thirteen lists of characteristics of effective professional development that had been assembled by different professional organizations and research groups.
Mat rated it really liked it Nov 22, I would occasionally notice barriers to my learning within organization or supports for my learning in the organization but they were not my main concern. A graduate of the University of Chicago, he began his career in education as a middle school teacher, served as an administrator in Chicago Public Schools, and was the first Director of the Center for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning, a national educational research center.
Evaluating Professional Development
I found myself nodding off while reading it. And if this is the case, funding may be withdrawn. What they want is evidence that things are getting better.
Katie Kelly added it Feb 28, This is a practical guide to evaluating professional development programs at five increasing levels of sophistication: