by Avishai Margalit, translated by Naomi Goldblum The Decent Society is both a commentary on, and an alternative to, our prevailing. Review of the Book The Decent Society, A. Margalit, [REVIEW]W. J. Witteveen – – Nexus Review of The Decent Society by Avishai Margalit. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Avishai Margalit: The Decent Society. | The title of this book will surely pique the interest of political philosophers who.
|Published (Last):||1 October 2017|
|PDF File Size:||4.3 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He presents the logical, moral and cognitive reasons for choosing “philosophica negativa”: In it, the additional idea is found, that the West, via its representatives who are currently ruling many Moslem countries, is the carrier of a new Jahiliyya — namely, ignorance and barbarism of the sort that ruled the world before the evangelical mission of the prophet Mohamed.
Thick political relations should be based neither on blood, nor on seed, nor on soil, but on shared historical memory. This article has no associated abstract.
Books by Avishai Margalit. Andrana Fox rated it it was amazing Jun 20, Avishai Margalit grew up in Jerusalem. Nelson Rojas rated it really liked it Dec 29, Politics and Culture in the State of the Jews Margalit avjshai that memory is the key to our ethical relationships, and that communities of memory are built upon a network of divisions of amrgalit for the different representations of memory.
To tell the story of a decent society, appealing to the honour of your hearers, in the hope of motivating people to bring its realization about in the way that argument alone could never do, is the central goal of this challenging work. Dayaa rated it liked it Feb 21, tne One of Margalit’s central theses in the book is that a “community of memory”, as a political concept, is more significant and weighty than the notion of the nation. D summa cum laude from the Hebrew University.
Social Theory and Practice 24 3: The question whether we are under a moral obligation to remember or to forget certain things is discussed in the book in light of a central distinction Margalit introduces, between ethics and morality.
Karen Ng – forthcoming – Philosophy and Social Criticism. Krause – – Nursing Ethics 11 1: Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Margalit begins concretely where we live with all the infuriating acts of humiliation that make living in the world so difficult. The tone of voice throughout the book is that of a serious but unponderous human being, continuously engaged with the reader, and determined to reason not only fairly but also graciously. My maryalit Help Advanced Book Search.
The Decent Society: Avishai Margalit, Naomi Goldblum: : Books
A fascinating and friendly read, on the easily comprehensible side of political philosophy, with an approach applicable to relationships and social goods as areas of concern. A decent society strives to eliminate the institutional humiliation of its members, which robs them of their self-respect or control over their lives.
Would you like to tell avishak about a lower price?
Refresh and try again. He argues in a concrete way in the spirit of Judith Shklar and Isaiah Berlin. In this margalitt,  Margalit argues that the pursuit of decency, understood primarily in terms of the absence of humiliation, takes precedence over the pursuit of the ideal of justice. The book is a model of how philosophers, using only a fine attention to distinctions between similar-sounding moral terms, can help to clarify, and by doing so, purify our moral language. The novelty in the book is its claim that the occidental worldview is itself rooted in the West.
Juan rated it really liked it Nov 01, The Decent Society by Avishai Margalit. Add both to Cart Add both to List.
Avishai Margalit, [Book review] the decent society – PhilPapers
Avishai Margalit Hebrew University of Jerusalem. By Margalit analysis, betrayal is a ternary relation, avishao is a relation holding between three objects. Lists with This Book.
The Decent Society
No trivia or quizzes yet. This page was last edited on 20 Septemberat Belonging is not based on achievement, it is not societh possession, but a bond. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Margalit can’t be earmarked as liberal or conservative. Most of the philosophical attention nowadays is maargalit to the ideal of the just society based on the right balance between freedom and equality.
Popular passages Page 12 – And they stripped him, and put on him a scarlet robe. Humiliation is a close second. The difference between a traitor worthy of contempt and a whistleblower worthy of applause, Margalit says, consists in the righteousness of their cause and the purity of their motives.
Avishai Margalit’s early research topics included the philosophy of language and of logicgeneral analytical philosophy and the concept of rationality. Aavishai all cases of humiliation share in common, in Margalit’s view, is justified feeling that the actions or omissions of another indicate that one is being rejected from the human commonwealth Anna Randel rated it really liked it May 03, Subscribe to receive information about forthcoming books, seasonal catalogs, and more, in newsletters tailored to your interests.
Customers who bought this item also bought. The Paradox of Humiliation.